• Games
  • Catalog
  • Develop
  • ROBUX
  • Search in People
  • Search in Games
  • Search in Catalog
  • Search in Groups
  • Search in Library
  • Log In
  • Sign Up
  • Games
  • Catalog
  • Develop
  • ROBUX
   
ROBLOX Forum » Club Houses » Off Topic
Home Search
 

Why are people saying that 1.0 was better then 2.0?

Previous Thread :: Next Thread 
User is not online. wafflemancan
Joined: -
Total Posts: -
-
10 Apr 2013 06:43 PM
I mean, if you think about it, there's nothing really wrong with 2.0 except for the fact that it has 3.0's arms and 3.0's legs. But other than that, it's pretty much fine.


Report Abuse
User is not online. 44u8b8p6w5z8v7m1
Joined: -
Total Posts: -
-
10 Apr 2013 06:44 PM
1.0 was better because it didnt look like a plastic block figure


Report Abuse
User is not online. wafflemancan
Joined: -
Total Posts: -
-
10 Apr 2013 06:54 PM
Well, actually, 1.0 was just an early version of the new character bodies. So you can't say that 2.0 looks like a plastic block figure.


Report Abuse
User is not online. TheRealBetatest123
Joined: -
Total Posts: -
-
10 Apr 2013 06:56 PM
Because they don't have good taste? ~Signatures are like cutie marks. Useless, pointless and stupid. -OsteriOssi9~


Report Abuse
Previous Thread :: Next Thread 
Page 1 of 1
 
 
ROBLOX Forum » Club Houses » Off Topic
       
  • About Us
  • Jobs
  • Blog
  • Parents
  • Help
  • Privacy

ROBLOX, "Online Building Toy", characters, logos, names, and all related indicia are trademarks of ROBLOX Corporation, ©2016. Patents pending. ROBLOX is not sponsored, authorized or endorsed by any producer of plastic building bricks, including The LEGO Group, MEGA Brands, and K'Nex, and no resemblance to the products of these companies is intended. Use of this site signifies your acceptance of the Terms and Conditions. This website is not affiliated with ROBLOX