|
|
| 20 Feb 2014 11:02 PM
|
A) Being able to sleep for as long as you want
OR
B) Never being hungry again
You'd pick which one?
~Add 7,576 posts to my post count~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Report
Abuse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 20 Feb 2014 11:04 PM
|
I would pick the hunger option. I would rather have more energy then sleep.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Report
Abuse
|
|
|
|
| 20 Feb 2014 11:05 PM
|
I think B. I'll be hungry and will have to sleep anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Report
Abuse
|
|
|
|
| 20 Feb 2014 11:05 PM
|
I would pick A. Not having to eat would mean not getting food poisoning or anything like that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Report
Abuse
|
|
 Lumez
|
|
| Joined:
- |
| Total
Posts:
-
|
|
-
|
|
| 20 Feb 2014 11:07 PM
|
I think A, but that's just me.
"The day science begins to study non-physical phenomena, it will break its neck, it's not just question of science but of human nature." -Nikola Tesla
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Report
Abuse
|
|
|
|
| 20 Feb 2014 11:08 PM
|
You can't die of hunger, and you'd always want to eat, so it wouldn't break your neck.
~Add 7,576 posts to my post count~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Report
Abuse
|
|
|
|
| 20 Feb 2014 11:10 PM
|
@TheColorfulGuest
Yeah, I read that.
But if you never get hungry again, that would mean you couldn't have a regular diet, which could lead to malnutrition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Report
Abuse
|
|
|
|
| 20 Feb 2014 11:11 PM
|
Yes, that is true, but you'd still be able to eat.
~Add 7,576 posts to my post count~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Report
Abuse
|
|
|
|
| 20 Feb 2014 11:13 PM
|
@TheColorfulGuest
Oh ok. That makes sense then.
I pick A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Report
Abuse
|
|